They aren't quite interchangeable. Both are used in the test suite, with no indication of why one or the other. I think we'd be best off being consistent. Based on the names, I think `_calculateFormulaValue` was intended as a private, or at least internal, method, so favor `calculateFormula`. I do not intend to rename or re-categorize `_calculateFormulaValue`, just remove its usage when it isn't clearly warranted.
When the Dynamic Array PR #3962 was introduced, it left the default as Return Array as Value. At some point, the default should be changed to Return Array as Array. This would, of course, be a breaking change, one which will not be part of Release 4. However, it will possibly be part of Release 5.
Rather than relying on the default setting, this PR explicitly sets Return Array as Value when tests require that setting. This will make it easier to identify potential breaks when the default is changed. The entire test suite will now succeed with either setting as default.
In making these changes, a few minor problems were discovered with how Array as Array is handled. These are fixed with this PR.
With PhpUnit 10 came the ability to use Php attributes rather than doc-block annotations for things like "data provider". PhpUnit 11 deprecates the use of annotations, and PhpUnit 12 will not not permit their use. Since PhpUnit 11 requires Php8.2+, we cannot adopt it as long as we support Php8.1, which will continue to be the case for some time. However, there is no penalty for early adoption.
Php-cs-fixer can use:
```
'php_unit_attributes' => ['keep_annotations' => false],
```
This allows us to run `composer fix` to automate all the needed changes. No manual changes were needed for any of the test members.
With this change, PhpUnit 9 can no longer be used with the test suite. File composer.json is updated to reflect that reality, and phpunit9.xml.dist, which has been supplied in case anyone needed to use PhpUnit 9, is no longer required, and is thus deleted. For now, PhpUnit 11 is not being added as a possibility.
No source code is changed in this PR.
While we might never be able to have 100% of our code strict, we can at
the very least do it for all of our tests. This ensures that our tests
are using our API with the types as intended by the test author, and not
silently be cast to what our API requires.
And quite a bit more manual changes. The idea is that typing of our
tests can be a bit more loose, so we assume PHPDoc is mostly correct. If
that happens to be wrong, it should be caught by the tests themselves.
Fix#3561. PhpSpreadsheet VLOOKUP/HLOOKUP allow the specification of index_number (third parameter) as an array when lookup_value (first parameter) is supplied as an array. Change to permit index_number as an array even when lookup_value is not an array, as Excel does.
Successor to PR #3523. There are 494 single-line changes (`public function provider` to `public static function provider`) in this PR. None of these were made manually; they were all created with the following script (adapted from
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25909820/how-to-recursively-iterate-through-files-in-php):
```php
$dir = 'C:/git/unit10prep2/tests/PhpSpreadsheetTests';
$it = new RecursiveDirectoryIterator($dir);
// Loop through files
foreach(new RecursiveIteratorIterator($it) as $file) {
if ($file->getExtension() === 'php') {
$contents = file_get_contents($file);
$new = preg_replace('/public function (\\w*)([Pp])rovider/', 'public static function $1$2rovider', $contents);
if ($new !== $contents) {
echo "changing $file\n";
file_put_contents($file, $new);
}
}
}
```
After this PR, there will be one more, with a small number of test changes, and enabling PhpUnit 10 for Php 8.1+.
* Fix Unintential Deprecated Calls in Tests - LOOKUPREF
I think it's best to install these before PR #3166. There are no changes to source code, only to test members which continue to inadvertently use calls to deprecated functions.
* Fix deprecation DocBlocks
Deprecated->deprecated, adjust see and comments
* One Intentional Deprecation
Annotate it.
* Initial work on implementing Array-enabled for the HLOOKUP() and VLOOKUP() functions
* In the MATCH() function, we should also use `evaluateArrayArgumentsIgnore()` because the lookupvalue and matchType arguments can be array arguments, but lookupArray is always a dataset matrix
See issue #2123. HLOOKUP needs to do some conversions between column numbers and letters which it had not been doing.
HLOOKUP tests were performed using direct calls to the function in question rather than in the context of a spreadsheet. This contributed to keeping this error obscured even though there were, in theory, sufficient test cases. The tests are changed to perform in spreadsheet context. For the most part, the test cases are unchanged. One of the expected results was wrong; it has been changed, and a new case added to cover the case it was supposed to be testing.
After getting the HLOOKUP tests in order, it turned out that a test using literal arrays which had been succeeding now failed. The array constructed by the literals are considerably different than those constructed using spreadsheet cells; additional code was added to handle this situation.
oleibman
Adrien Crivelli
MarkBaker
Mark Baker
oleibman