They aren't quite interchangeable. Both are used in the test suite, with no indication of why one or the other. I think we'd be best off being consistent. Based on the names, I think `_calculateFormulaValue` was intended as a private, or at least internal, method, so favor `calculateFormula`. I do not intend to rename or re-categorize `_calculateFormulaValue`, just remove its usage when it isn't clearly warranted.
With PhpUnit 10 came the ability to use Php attributes rather than doc-block annotations for things like "data provider". PhpUnit 11 deprecates the use of annotations, and PhpUnit 12 will not not permit their use. Since PhpUnit 11 requires Php8.2+, we cannot adopt it as long as we support Php8.1, which will continue to be the case for some time. However, there is no penalty for early adoption.
Php-cs-fixer can use:
```
'php_unit_attributes' => ['keep_annotations' => false],
```
This allows us to run `composer fix` to automate all the needed changes. No manual changes were needed for any of the test members.
With this change, PhpUnit 9 can no longer be used with the test suite. File composer.json is updated to reflect that reality, and phpunit9.xml.dist, which has been supplied in case anyone needed to use PhpUnit 9, is no longer required, and is thus deleted. For now, PhpUnit 11 is not being added as a possibility.
No source code is changed in this PR.
Change "mixed" declarations to more accurate types in test members; in particular, change those that would be flagged if we were to run Phpstan at level 9 (we currently run level 8). I may or may not follow up with source code (over 700 level-9 problems remain for src), but, as with strict typing, there is no reason to avoid the effort for test members.
It was necessary to update some doc blocks in src to accommodate this change. However, no executable code is touched.
While we might never be able to have 100% of our code strict, we can at
the very least do it for all of our tests. This ensures that our tests
are using our API with the types as intended by the test author, and not
silently be cast to what our API requires.
And quite a bit more manual changes. The idea is that typing of our
tests can be a bit more loose, so we assume PHPDoc is mostly correct. If
that happens to be wrong, it should be caught by the tests themselves.
Successor to PR #3523. There are 494 single-line changes (`public function provider` to `public static function provider`) in this PR. None of these were made manually; they were all created with the following script (adapted from
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25909820/how-to-recursively-iterate-through-files-in-php):
```php
$dir = 'C:/git/unit10prep2/tests/PhpSpreadsheetTests';
$it = new RecursiveDirectoryIterator($dir);
// Loop through files
foreach(new RecursiveIteratorIterator($it) as $file) {
if ($file->getExtension() === 'php') {
$contents = file_get_contents($file);
$new = preg_replace('/public function (\\w*)([Pp])rovider/', 'public static function $1$2rovider', $contents);
if ($new !== $contents) {
echo "changing $file\n";
file_put_contents($file, $new);
}
}
}
```
After this PR, there will be one more, with a small number of test changes, and enabling PhpUnit 10 for Php 8.1+.
* MATCH Problems with Int/Float Compare and Wildcards
Fix#3141. Function matchSmallestValue did not recognize that an integer could match a float. Adding test cases, it seems that matchFirstValue had the same problem. However, matchLargestValue seemed to handle things correctly - but see below.
In addition, the wildcard logic in matchFirstValue is faulty. It ignored tilde as a wildcard character. Although it would have been easy to just add that, I think it was wrong to determine on its own if a wildcard was in use. Just using the already available wildcard functions whenever comparing two strings is sufficient.
I note that Excel doesn't seem to follow its own rules for MATCH (https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/match-function-e8dffd45-c762-47d6-bf89-533f4a37673a?ns=excel&version=90&syslcid=1033&uilcid=1033&appver=zxl900&helpid=xlmain11.chm60112&ui=en-us&rs=en-us&ad=us). PhpSpreadsheet's results match Excel's, so no problem. However, when match_type is not zero, the match array is supposed to be sorted, so I would expect `#N/A` when it isn't; but that's not how Excel operates. I have no idea what Excel is doing. If `MATCH(2,{2,0,4,3},1)` isn't `#N/A` because of the unsorted array, then surely it should be `1` (item 1 of the array is the largest number less than or equal to the lookup value); but Excel and PhpSpreadsheet (before and after changes) return `2`. I have moved this example to be the first of the test cases.
One would think strings would behave similarly. But, no - see the second test case. This time Excel does look for an exact match. But the existing logic doesn't get the matching result in PhpSpreadsheet. It requires a whole new block of code, one which doesn't work correctly for numeric lookup value. Ugh.
LibreOffice doesn't always agree with Excel. It seems that it will use wildcard matching even when the match type is not zero (Excel documentation says wildcards are only for type zero, which is just as well because I don't really know what greater/less mean when wildcards are involved). I have not attempted to duplicate this behavior. For the record, Gnumeric agrees with Excel here.
* More Changes - LibreOffice
Add support for LibreOffice matching wildcard strings when type is not zero. Add support for type to be specified as integer other than 0/1/-1, or as float, or as numeric string; non-numeric string should case `#VALUE!` error.
I have found an example of undefined behavior (unsorted array where type is non-zero) where PhpSpreadsheet does not produce the same result as Excel. It is present as a new `incomplete` test case. I can fix it, but not without breaking other tests where the proper behavior is undefined. IMO, this is not a problem we should be concerned about.
Many test cases are added. Chances are I will add some more before merging this change.
* Start work on array-enabling the Lookup and Reference functions
Requires a new method (`evaluateArrayArgumentsSubsetFrom()`) in the `ArrayEnabled` Trait to handle functions where the arguments that need special array handling are trailing rather than leading arguments
oleibman
Adrien Crivelli
Mark Baker