They aren't quite interchangeable. Both are used in the test suite, with no indication of why one or the other. I think we'd be best off being consistent. Based on the names, I think `_calculateFormulaValue` was intended as a private, or at least internal, method, so favor `calculateFormula`. I do not intend to rename or re-categorize `_calculateFormulaValue`, just remove its usage when it isn't clearly warranted.
With PhpUnit 10 came the ability to use Php attributes rather than doc-block annotations for things like "data provider". PhpUnit 11 deprecates the use of annotations, and PhpUnit 12 will not not permit their use. Since PhpUnit 11 requires Php8.2+, we cannot adopt it as long as we support Php8.1, which will continue to be the case for some time. However, there is no penalty for early adoption.
Php-cs-fixer can use:
```
'php_unit_attributes' => ['keep_annotations' => false],
```
This allows us to run `composer fix` to automate all the needed changes. No manual changes were needed for any of the test members.
With this change, PhpUnit 9 can no longer be used with the test suite. File composer.json is updated to reflect that reality, and phpunit9.xml.dist, which has been supplied in case anyone needed to use PhpUnit 9, is no longer required, and is thus deleted. For now, PhpUnit 11 is not being added as a possibility.
No source code is changed in this PR.
Change "mixed" declarations to more accurate types in test members; in particular, change those that would be flagged if we were to run Phpstan at level 9 (we currently run level 8). I may or may not follow up with source code (over 700 level-9 problems remain for src), but, as with strict typing, there is no reason to avoid the effort for test members.
It was necessary to update some doc blocks in src to accommodate this change. However, no executable code is touched.
Because they tend to clutter our code a lot and unfortunately, there are
lots of false positives. Instead, it would probably be better to deal
with false positives out of band, via the Scrutinizer web UI.
While we might never be able to have 100% of our code strict, we can at
the very least do it for all of our tests. This ensures that our tests
are using our API with the types as intended by the test author, and not
silently be cast to what our API requires.
And quite a bit more manual changes. The idea is that typing of our
tests can be a bit more loose, so we assume PHPDoc is mostly correct. If
that happens to be wrong, it should be caught by the tests themselves.
Successor to PR #3523. There are 494 single-line changes (`public function provider` to `public static function provider`) in this PR. None of these were made manually; they were all created with the following script (adapted from
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25909820/how-to-recursively-iterate-through-files-in-php):
```php
$dir = 'C:/git/unit10prep2/tests/PhpSpreadsheetTests';
$it = new RecursiveDirectoryIterator($dir);
// Loop through files
foreach(new RecursiveIteratorIterator($it) as $file) {
if ($file->getExtension() === 'php') {
$contents = file_get_contents($file);
$new = preg_replace('/public function (\\w*)([Pp])rovider/', 'public static function $1$2rovider', $contents);
if ($new !== $contents) {
echo "changing $file\n";
file_put_contents($file, $new);
}
}
}
```
After this PR, there will be one more, with a small number of test changes, and enabling PhpUnit 10 for Php 8.1+.
* Eliminate Most Scrutinizer Problems in Test Suite
Mostly minor code changes, with some annotations.
* Missed 2 php-cs-fixer Problems
They should be fixed now.
* Continue MathTrig Breakup - Penultimate?
Continuing the process of breaking MathTrip.php up into smaller classes. This round takes care of about half of what is left, so perhaps one round after this one will finish the job:
- ARABIC
- COMBIN; also implemented COMBINA
- FACTDOUBLE
- GCD (which accepts and ignores empty cells as arguments, but returns VALUE if all the arguments are that way; LCM does the same)
- LOG_BASE, LOG10, LN
- implemented MUNIT
- MOD
- POWER
- RAND, RANDBETWEEN (RANDARRAY is too complicated to implement with this ticket)
As you can see from the description, there are some functions which were combined in a single class. When not combined, I adopted PowerKiki's suggestion of using "execute" as the function name.
Co-authored-by: Mark Baker <mark@lange.demon.co.uk>
oleibman
Adrien Crivelli
Mark Baker
Owen Leibman