When the Dynamic Array PR #3962 was introduced, it left the default as Return Array as Value. At some point, the default should be changed to Return Array as Array. This would, of course, be a breaking change, one which will not be part of Release 4. However, it will possibly be part of Release 5.
Rather than relying on the default setting, this PR explicitly sets Return Array as Value when tests require that setting. This will make it easier to identify potential breaks when the default is changed. The entire test suite will now succeed with either setting as default.
In making these changes, a few minor problems were discovered with how Array as Array is handled. These are fixed with this PR.
With PhpUnit 10 came the ability to use Php attributes rather than doc-block annotations for things like "data provider". PhpUnit 11 deprecates the use of annotations, and PhpUnit 12 will not not permit their use. Since PhpUnit 11 requires Php8.2+, we cannot adopt it as long as we support Php8.1, which will continue to be the case for some time. However, there is no penalty for early adoption.
Php-cs-fixer can use:
```
'php_unit_attributes' => ['keep_annotations' => false],
```
This allows us to run `composer fix` to automate all the needed changes. No manual changes were needed for any of the test members.
With this change, PhpUnit 9 can no longer be used with the test suite. File composer.json is updated to reflect that reality, and phpunit9.xml.dist, which has been supplied in case anyone needed to use PhpUnit 9, is no longer required, and is thus deleted. For now, PhpUnit 11 is not being added as a possibility.
No source code is changed in this PR.
Continuing work started with PR #4016, PR #4026, and PR #4060. Improve documentation within program by making explicit what types of values are allowed for variables described as "mixed". In order to avoid broken functionality, this is done mainly through doc-blocks. This will get us closer to Phpstan Level 9, but many changes will be needed before we can consider that.
After this PR, 231 changes remain, all in src/Calculation.
Till now we have used a static variable/getter/setter to decide what type of result should be returned when a formula is evaluated and an array is the result. This is messy; it would be much better to use an instance variable instead. We cannot eliminate `setArrayReturnType` and `getArrayReturnType` because that would be a BC break. I am considering whether they should be deprecated. In the meantime, I have added a new instance property `instanceArrayReturnType` with getter and setter methods. The property is initially null, and, if it remains so when needed, the static property will be used instead. However, if it is set, its value will be used.
oleibman
Owen Leibman