5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
oleibman d647fe7ee7 Use Php Attributes Rather than Annotations for PhpUnit
With PhpUnit 10 came the ability to use Php attributes rather than doc-block annotations for things like "data provider". PhpUnit 11 deprecates the use of annotations, and PhpUnit 12 will not not permit their use. Since PhpUnit 11 requires Php8.2+, we cannot adopt it as long as we support Php8.1, which will continue to be the case for some time. However, there is no penalty for early adoption.

Php-cs-fixer can use:
```
'php_unit_attributes' => ['keep_annotations' => false],
```
This allows us to run `composer fix` to automate all the needed changes. No manual changes were needed for any of the test members.

With this change, PhpUnit 9 can no longer be used with the test suite. File composer.json is updated to reflect that reality, and phpunit9.xml.dist, which has been supplied in case anyone needed to use PhpUnit 9, is no longer required, and is thus deleted. For now, PhpUnit 11 is not being added as a possibility.

No source code is changed in this PR.
2024-11-23 20:56:26 -08:00
Adrien Crivelli ec4098c8fd Strict mode for all tests
While we might never be able to have 100% of our code strict, we can at
the very least do it for all of our tests. This ensures that our tests
are using our API with the types as intended by the test author, and not
silently be cast to what our API requires.
2023-09-07 17:44:56 +08:00
oleibman e9cf27354d PhpUnit 10 Compatibility Part 2 (#3526)
Successor to PR #3523. There are 494 single-line changes (`public function provider` to `public static function provider`) in this PR. None of these were made manually; they were all created with the following script (adapted from
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25909820/how-to-recursively-iterate-through-files-in-php):
```php
$dir = 'C:/git/unit10prep2/tests/PhpSpreadsheetTests';
$it = new RecursiveDirectoryIterator($dir);

// Loop through files
foreach(new RecursiveIteratorIterator($it) as $file) {
    if ($file->getExtension() === 'php') {
        $contents = file_get_contents($file);
        $new = preg_replace('/public function (\\w*)([Pp])rovider/', 'public static function $1$2rovider', $contents);
        if ($new !== $contents) {
            echo "changing $file\n";
            file_put_contents($file, $new);
        }
    }
}
```

After this PR, there will be one more, with a small number of test changes, and enabling PhpUnit 10 for Php 8.1+.
2023-04-20 13:48:00 -07:00
Owen Leibman 3bb574c302 Fix SettingsTest
SettingsTest was changing the global LibXMLLoaderOptions without restoring the original. This caused problems for one of my new tests.
2021-06-30 11:33:35 -07:00
Owen Leibman 36b328a9fa Fix Worksheet Passwords
Fix for issue #1897.

The existing hashing code seems to work correctly almost all the time, but there are exceptions. It is replaced by an exact implementation of the spec, including a link to the spec in the comments. Cases known to fail are added to the unit test suite.

The spec expects the string to be at most 255 bytes (yes, bytes not characters). The program had permitted any length; it will now throw an exception when the maximum length is exceeded.

Xls does not support any hashing algorithm except basic. The Xls writer had, nevertheless, accepted the results of any of the other possible algorithms. This leads to (a) a worksheet that can't be unprotected, and (b) deprecation notices during the write (because it is using hexdec, which expects only hex characters, and the other algorithms generate non-hex characters). I have changed Xls writer to ignore passwords generated by other algorithms. An alternative would be to have the password hasher generate both an algorithmic password (for use by Xlsx) and a basic password (for use by Xls); I think that is too complex a solution, but can look into it if you think it worthwhile.

I do not see any current support for Worksheet passwords in ODS Reader or Writer. I did not add support in this PR.

I added a new test to confirm the password for reading a spreadsheet is consistent with the one used for writing it. As you can see from the comments for the new test, it had an unusual problem with a somewhat unusual solution.
2021-06-29 09:11:51 -07:00